The Statistics of Return Forecasting: Heavy Tails, Estimation, and the Limits of Predictive Inference
Abstract
A self-contained, mathematically rigorous account of why forecasting asset returns is hard, and of the estimation theory the difficulty demands. The paper formalizes the forecasting problem for a stationary, ergodic return process and decomposes predictive risk to show that estimation error governs out-of-sample performance and the finite-sample bias of predictive regression is first-order. It then develops the two technical obstacles that distinguish financial data from textbook settings: serial dependence — requiring limit theory for dependent sequences, HAC variance estimation, and modern predictive-ability testing — and heavy tails, the central theme, where returns are regularly varying with a finite tail index so high moments may not exist and classical central-limit and sample-moment arguments become fragile, motivating extreme-value theory (Fisher–Tippett–Gnedenko, Pickands–Balkema–de Haan) and tail-index estimation. Particular attention is given to empirical confidence and prediction intervals: when asymptotic normality fails, validity is recovered by resampling that respects dependence and heavy tails (block and stationary bootstraps, subsampling) and by distribution-free conformal prediction with finite-sample coverage, extended to the non-exchangeable, non-stationary regime finance inhabits. It closes with a rigorous workflow and open problems. Classical theorems are stated with assumptions and attributed to their sources; elementary results are proved.
Keywords
JEL codes
Download PDFCite
@techreport{shehadi2026statistics,
author = {Shehadi Candela, Agust\'in},
title = {The Statistics of Return Forecasting: Heavy Tails, Estimation, and the Limits of Predictive Inference},
institution = {QUAFI Research},
type = {QUAFI Working Paper},
number = {2026-03},
year = {2026}
}Preliminary working paper; circulated for discussion. The views are the author's own. Not investment advice.